The Holmes Equation actually sum , and multiplies , up the equation for the arrant butt . Sadly , unlike the sodding butt , it is one - sided ! Can you facilitate labialize out this equation fix ?
David Holmes , who lectured in psychological science at the University of Manchester in England , showed off his endowment for selling , when he announce that he had the equality to create the perfect butt . It incorporated musculus look , tegument grain , and overall attractiveness . It ’s middling dim-witted .
( S+C ) x ( B+F)/T = V
The variables all abide for dissimilar thing .
( Shape + Circularity ) x ( Bounce + Firmness)/Texture = Hip to Waist Ratio .
He claims that 0.7 would be the perfect V. So clearly , that ’s all worked out .
Sadly , it seems that Holmes meant this as a way to evaluate the female tooshie — while the male rear bumper was neglected . When I read about this , it saddened me , as I ’m certain it does you all , that the serviceman of this world have to wander around know that their ass prettiness is not dependably quantifiable . I call on all Io9ers to work out a similar mathematics par for the male tight end . Anyone deal to venture an equivalence ?
Top Image:4FreePhotos
ViaSalon .
buttsmathScience
Daily Newsletter
Get the in effect technical school , skill , and culture news in your inbox daily .
News from the futurity , deliver to your nowadays .
You May Also Like
