When AT&T rebranded part of its 4 G cell service as 5 g-force Es , or 5 G Evolution , it was n’t fool anyone . That ’s because , despite claims that 5 1000 tocopherol was the first footmark to a true 5 G connection , the phones were the same , the speeds were the same , the only thing that had changed was the little ikon in the corner of the concealment . And now , mobile analytics firmOpensignalhas the numbers to prove it .
In a recently conducted experiment , Opensignal recorded download speeds of AT&T 5 G Es phones and standard 4 G handsets and then compare them to the download speed of similar earpiece on all the other major web .
What Opensignal found is that while 5 one thousand eastward devices on AT&T were degraded than their 4 G comrade , compare to like equipment on other networks , download speeds for AT&T 5 gibibyte E - up to equipment were n’t any faster than those on Verizon or T - Mobile . In fact , 5 G E - capable devices were actually a tiny bit slower on AT&T ’s web when compare to everyone but Sprint .
Photo: Sam Rutherford (Gizmodo)
The trick for AT&T is that by bundling more recent LTE Advanced Pro technology such as 4X4 MIMO and 256QAM and assort them under the umbrella of 5 G E , AT&T gets to create the illusion that 5 G E devices bid increased datum speeds . But they do n’t , as these features are construct into the devices , and usable for use on other internet , as attest by the act in Opensignal ’s graph .
However , it is important to observe that as part of Opensignal ’s testing , the firm did not in reality differentiate between times when AT&T devices display the 5 G E icon as counterbalance to the standard 4 G picture . That ’s because , for Opensignal , the goal was “ to compare the 5 deoxyguanosine monophosphate Es experience with the user connect to the other US carriers that do not show 5 G due east but put up the same 4 G technologies . ”
Opensignal also added that because both LTE Advanced Pro tech and 5 G Es are n’t always available due to affair like locating or other factors , and that the devices it tested all feature similar capacity , it is still able to establish that 5 G E is equivalent to the habit of LTE Advanced Pro technical school on other networks .
When asked for comment , an AT&T interpreter provided this statement :
OpenSignal ’s banker’s bill let out their methodology is flawed . Speed mental test datum purpose to show the “ literal - earthly concern experience of 5 G Evolution ” without verifying the capable devices were tested in a 5 G Evolution coverage area as demonstrate by the indicator does not accurately interpret the 5 G Evolution user experience .
The bottom - line is that all of these web face the same challenge but only AT&T is using brand to make their web seem like it ’s something it ’s not . AT&T just needs to take the L.
For Sprint , which is currentlysuing AT&Tover its egregious use of goods and services of 5 G , this data could make its effectual compositor’s case even strong . Meanwhile , for people just look to get good data point upper on current networks , your undecomposed bet is to check class ratings for the modem on a specific cellular phone . headphone with a Cat 18 modem like theGalaxy S10will have good speeds than old devices with Cat 12 modems like the Galaxy S7 or iPhone 8 . ( Like most technical school , bigger telephone number for Cat paygrade are skilful ) .
[ Opensignal ]
Consumer TechSmartphoneswireless carrier
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and polish tidings in your inbox daily .
News from the future , delivered to your nowadays .
Please select your hope newssheet and render your email to elevate your inbox .
You May Also Like
