A Judge With Common Sense Says Cellphone Tracking Is as Intrusive as a GPS Tracker

A NY state judgehas saidthat expect up a someone ’s movements via cell phone location information is just as intrusive as GPS trailing . sanctify him .

Here ’s a fantastically verbose quote fromthe opinion of Judge Orenstein of the Eastern District of New York , who seems to be a noteworthy instance of some who know what ’s going on in the modern world :

“ The decision in Maynard is just one of several rulings in recent years reflecting a growing realisation , at least in some courts , that engineering has progressed to the point where a somebody who wishes to partake in the social , cultural , and political personal matters of our society has no realistic option but to queer to others , if not to the public as a whole , a broad range of conduct and communications that would previously have been deem unquestionably private ”

24tb Seagate Drive

In United v. Maynard , the previous case Orenstein touch to , the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit predominate that the government must obtain a warrantee to cover a mortal ’s movements via GPS track machine . What Orenstein say is that the same principle give to re - creating a person ’s bowel movement using historical cellphone positioning data point — that it ’s just as intrusive to Americans ’ sensible expectation of privacy . In the ruling , Orenstein and the court deny the government ’s request to get at two months of historic cell location information without a warranty from wandering web Sprint .

A relieving contrast toa much different ruling last week , by the West ’s Ninth District Court of Appeals that ruled trailing by GPS is hunky-dory and not a privacy violation at all . Crazy.[RulingviaACLUandBoing Boing ]

https://gizmodo.com/our-worst-nightmares-about-the-government-tracking-us-j-5622800

Gopro Hero13 Limited Editon